Software Engineers and Documentation
This message
: [
Message body
] [
Respond
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Mail actions
: [
respond to this message
] [
mail a new topic
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: [at]} <
Venkat
>
Date
: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 09:05:21 -0500 (EST)
Blackbox Users:
I agree that documentation is an often short shrifted. But its
importance cannot be over-emphasized and I agree that it can contribute
significantly to improved design and coding. Something that is hard to
document is probably hard to use and hard to construct reliably.
But I must defend OuS on the overall quality of their documentation.
Even errors are relatively easy to spot, because of the clarity of
preceding and subsequent paragraphs. The quantity of documentation to
master is significant, but that appears to be inherent in the nature of
frameworks of this sort. Compared to Java, it is indeed compact.
Venkat Rao
GTE
Received on
Thu Mar 04 1999 - 15:08:53 UTC
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Douglas G. Danforth: "Re: Software Engineers and Documentation"
Previous message
:
[at]}: "StdStamps question"
Next in thread
:
Douglas G. Danforth: "Re: Software Engineers and Documentation"
Reply
:
Douglas G. Danforth: "Re: Software Engineers and Documentation"
Reply
:
[at]}: "Re: Software Engineers and Documentation"
Mail actions
: [
respond to this message
] [
mail a new topic
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.3.0
: Thu Sep 26 2013 - 06:27:42 UTC