Re: [BLACKBOX] structured return types

From: [at]} <Fyodor>
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 21:29:18 +0400

----boundary-LibPST-iamunique-1118961786_-_-
Content-type: text/plain

Just in case this was not mentioned:

Structured return types are not well compatible with extensibility (polymorphism).

Since they are not really necessary (just use OUT),
the excessive complexity involved is unwelcome.

cheers
fyodor


Powered by the E-mail PIM - Info Select - www.miclog.com

----
To unsubscribe, send a message with body "SIGNOFF BLACKBOX" to LISTSERV{([at]})nowhere.xy----boundary-LibPST-iamunique-1118961786_-_-
Content-type: application/rtf
Content-transfer-encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="rtf-body.rtf"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----boundary-LibPST-iamunique-1118961786_-_---

Received on Sun Jul 05 2009 - 19:29:18 UTC