Re: [BLACKBOX] IN Parameters - Making the design more regular

From: [at]} <Robert>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:38:02 +0000

----boundary-LibPST-iamunique-1534851915_-_-
Content-type: text/plain

Chris

I would support your proposal to allow IN parameters
for simple types. It does seem to offer (modest?)
advantages.

I think that the exact wording you proposed should
be improved. In fact I suspect that the recent discussion
here would have been shorter if the wording had more
accurately and clearly captured your intentions.

Regards

Robert

----
To unsubscribe, send a message with body "SIGNOFF BLACKBOX" to LISTSERV{([at]})nowhere.xy----boundary-LibPST-iamunique-1534851915_-_-
Content-type: application/rtf
Content-transfer-encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="rtf-body.rtf"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==
----boundary-LibPST-iamunique-1534851915_-_---

Received on Wed Jan 30 2008 - 21:38:02 UTC